> Let's see if that logic makes sense: if #MC offlines the page and sends > SIGBUS but CMCI only offlines the page, isn't it only logical for the > CMCI to *also* send the SIGBUS too, after having offlined the page? > > I.e., both should do the proper and full recovery action. Just sayin...
It made sense, and seemed to explain an issue I was seeing, when I wrote it. But some stress testing of that patch showed that it introduces some problems and instability. Without the patch I can inject 10,000 errors and have every one of them complete correctly (process gets a SIGBUS with the address of the error). With my patch around 0.4% of injections fail to provide the address to the SIGBUS handler, worse the test gets a fatal error every 600-700 injections. So, I'm abandoning that patch. -Tony
