On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Seems to be some garbling on there in the signed-off lines.
Yes that needs to be fixed.
> > +void dcache_ctor(struct kmem_cache *s, void *p)
> > +{
> > + struct dentry *dentry = p;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_init(&dentry->d_lock);
> > + dentry->d_inode = NULL;
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dentry->d_lru);
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dentry->d_alias);
> > +}
> > +
>
> Is there any noticable overhead to the constructor?
Its a minor performance win since we can avoid reinitializing these
values and zeroing the object on alloc if there are already allocated
objects.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
