On 2020-07-15 15:38:08 [+0200], Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > As of -rc3 it should complain about printk() which is why it is still > > disabled by default. > > > Have you tried to trigger a "complain" you are talking about?
No, but I is wrong because a raw_spinlock_t is acquired followed by a spinlock_t. > I suspect to get some trace dump when CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING=y. You should get one if you haven't received any splat earlier (like from printk code because it only triggers once). > Thank you. Sebastian
