On 01-07-20, 12:20, Xin Hao wrote: > The 'caps' variable has been defined, so there is no need to get > 'highest_perf' value through 'cpu->caps.highest_perf', you can use > 'caps->highest_perf' instead. > > Signed-off-by: Xin Hao <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c > index 257d726a4456..051d0e56c67a 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c > @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(struct > cppc_cpudata *cpu, > if (!max_khz) > max_khz = cppc_get_dmi_max_khz(); > mul = max_khz; > - div = cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf; > + div = caps->highest_perf; > } > return (u64)perf * mul / div; > } > @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_khz_to_perf(struct > cppc_cpudata *cpu, > } else { > if (!max_khz) > max_khz = cppc_get_dmi_max_khz(); > - mul = cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf; > + mul = caps->highest_perf; > div = max_khz; > }
Applied. Thanks. -- viresh
