Use ima_validate_rule() to ensure that the combination of a hook
function and the keyrings conditional is valid and that the keyrings
conditional is not specified without an explicit KEY_CHECK func
conditional. This is a code cleanup and has no user-facing change.

Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <[email protected]>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c 
b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 514baf24d6a5..ae2ec2a9cdb9 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -999,6 +999,12 @@ static bool ima_validate_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
                case KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK:
                case KEXEC_INITRAMFS_CHECK:
                case POLICY_CHECK:
+                       if (entry->flags & ~(IMA_FUNC | IMA_MASK | IMA_FSMAGIC |
+                                            IMA_UID | IMA_FOWNER | IMA_FSUUID |
+                                            IMA_INMASK | IMA_EUID | IMA_PCR |
+                                            IMA_FSNAME))
+                               return false;
+
                        break;
                case KEXEC_CMDLINE:
                        if (entry->action & ~(MEASURE | DONT_MEASURE))
@@ -1026,7 +1032,8 @@ static bool ima_validate_rule(struct ima_rule_entry 
*entry)
                default:
                        return false;
                }
-       }
+       } else if (entry->flags & IMA_KEYRINGS)
+               return false;
 
        return true;
 }
@@ -1208,7 +1215,6 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct 
ima_rule_entry *entry)
                        keyrings_len = strlen(args[0].from) + 1;
 
                        if ((entry->keyrings) ||
-                           (entry->func != KEY_CHECK) ||
                            (keyrings_len < 2)) {
                                result = -EINVAL;
                                break;
-- 
2.25.1

Reply via email to