On Fri, 19 Jun 2020, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> That is indeed really strange, as that commit is just a rename.
> Well, Linus also added swapping of the argument order, but again it
> shouldn't change much.

Thing is, there's other examples of the previous version in the kernel tree- any
chance there's a usage conflict (Thunderbolt has a ROM in it, maybe something in
"probe_roms.c"? (Just guessing, no idea):

----
afind probe_kernel_address
./lib/test_lockup.c:        probe_kernel_address(ptr, buf) ||
./lib/test_lockup.c:        probe_kernel_address(ptr + size - 1, buf)) {
./lib/test_lockup.c:    if (probe_kernel_address(ptr, magic) || magic != 
expected) {
./arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c:            if (probe_kernel_address((__force 
__le32 *)pc, instr_le))
./arch/sh/kernel/traps.c:       if (probe_kernel_address((insn_size_t *)addr, 
opcode))
./arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:      if (probe_kernel_address((unsigned short 
*)addr, ud))
./arch/x86/kernel/probe_roms.c:         if (probe_kernel_address(rom_list, 
device) != 0)
./arch/x86/kernel/probe_roms.c:         if (probe_kernel_address(rom + 0x18, 
offset) != 0)
./arch/x86/kernel/probe_roms.c:         if (probe_kernel_address(rom + offset + 
0x4, vendor) != 0)
./arch/x86/kernel/probe_roms.c:         if (probe_kernel_address(rom + offset + 
0x6, device) != 0)
./arch/x86/kernel/probe_roms.c:         if (probe_kernel_address(rom + offset + 
0x8, list) == 0 &&
./arch/x86/kernel/probe_roms.c:             probe_kernel_address(rom + offset + 
0xc, rev) == 0 &&
./arch/x86/kernel/probe_roms.c: return probe_kernel_address(ptr, sig) == 0 && 
sig == ROMSIGNATURE;
./arch/x86/kernel/probe_roms.c: for (sum = 0; length && 
probe_kernel_address(rom++, c) == 0; length--)
./arch/x86/kernel/probe_roms.c:         if (probe_kernel_address(rom + 2, c) != 
0)
./arch/x86/kernel/probe_roms.c:         if (probe_kernel_address(rom + 2, c) != 
0)
./arch/x86/mm/fault.c:          if (probe_kernel_address(instr, opcode))
./arch/x86/mm/fault.c:          if (probe_kernel_address(instr, opcode))
./arch/x86/mm/fault.c:  return probe_kernel_address((unsigned long *)p, dummy);
./arch/x86/pci/pcbios.c:                if 
(probe_kernel_address(&check->fields.signature, sig))
./arch/arm/mm/alignment.c:              fault = probe_kernel_address(ip, instr);
./arch/arm/mm/alignment.c:              fault = probe_kernel_address(ip, instr);
./arch/s390/mm/fault.c: return probe_kernel_address((unsigned long *)p, dummy);
./arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c:                    probe_kernel_address((const 
void *)pc, instr)) {
./arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c:                if (probe_kernel_address(addr, 
instr))
./arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c:                        ret = 
probe_kernel_address((void *)regs->nip, inst);
./arch/riscv/kernel/kgdb.c:     if (probe_kernel_address((void *)pc, op_code))
./arch/riscv/kernel/kgdb.c:     error = probe_kernel_address((void *)addr, 
stepped_opcode);
./arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c:    if (probe_kernel_address((bug_insn_t *)pc, 
insn))
./arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c:    if (probe_kernel_address((bug_insn_t *)pc, 
insn))
----

> Do you see any compiler warnings or something
> odd in the kernel log before the actual crash?

Not that I could see, but I'll try building again later on.

        -Kenny

-- 
Kenneth R. Crudup  Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Silicon Valley

Reply via email to