On (20/05/15 18:02), Petr Mladek wrote: > On Wed 2020-04-15 20:00:43, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > It is a logical continuation of previously applied %ptR for struct rtc_time. > > We have few users of time64_t that would like to print it. > > It seems that everything was explained and the patches look good to > me. If we allowed %ptR then it makes sense to allow %ptT as well. > > For all three patches: > > Rewieved-by: Petr Mladek <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <[email protected]> -ss
