On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:58:14AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > In most contexts '-1' doesn't really mean much to the casual observer. > In almost all cases, it's better to use a human readable define. In > this case PLATFORM_DEVID_* defines have already been provided for this > purpose. > > While we're here, let's be specific about the 'MFD devices' which > failed. It will help when trying to distinguish which of the 2 sets > of sub-devices we actually failed to register.
No objections... but won't the tag added by dev_err() already disambiguate? > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c b/drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c > index f1825c0ccbd0..2c47afc22d24 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c > +++ b/drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c > @@ -127,10 +127,11 @@ static int cs5535_mfd_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, > cs5535_mfd_cells[i].id = 0; > } > > - err = mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, -1, cs5535_mfd_cells, > + err = mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, cs5535_mfd_cells, > ARRAY_SIZE(cs5535_mfd_cells), NULL, 0, NULL); > if (err) { > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "MFD add devices failed: %d\n", err); > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, > + "Failed to add CS5532 sub-devices: %d\n", err); ^^^ Typo (and MODULE_DESCRIPTION() says this is a driver for CS5536 too). Once that is fixed: Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <[email protected]> Daniel.
