On 7/10/19 2:20 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 11:31:20AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> 
> SNIP
> 
>>      u8 pad[8] = {0};
>>  
>> -    if (!perf_data__is_pipe(data) && !perf_data__is_dir(data)) {
>> +    if (!perf_data__is_pipe(data) && perf_data__is_single_file(data)) {
>>              off_t file_offset;
>>              int fd = perf_data__fd(data);
>>              int err;
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/data.c b/tools/perf/util/data.c
>> index df173f0bf654..964ea101dba6 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/data.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/data.c
>> @@ -76,6 +76,13 @@ int perf_data__open_dir(struct perf_data *data)
>>      DIR *dir;
>>      int nr = 0;
>>  
>> +    /*
>> +     * Directory containing a single regular perf data file which is already
>> +     * open, means there is nothing more to do here.
>> +     */
>> +    if (perf_data__is_single_file(data))
>> +            return 0;
>> +
> 
> cool, I like this approach much more than the previous flag

Yes it is much nicer.  Thanks for your direction on that.

> 
> any change you (if there's repost) or Arnaldo
> could squeeze in indent change below?

Sent a patch, to be applied before these.

> 
> thanks,
> jirka
> 
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c
> index bfa80fe8d369..7f567a521cea 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/session.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c
> @@ -227,8 +227,8 @@ struct perf_session *perf_session__new(struct perf_data 
> *data,
>                       /* Open the directory data. */
>                       if (data->is_dir) {
>                               ret = perf_data__open_dir(data);
> -                     if (ret)
> -                             goto out_delete;
> +                             if (ret)
> +                                     goto out_delete;
>                       }
>  
>                       if (!symbol_conf.kallsyms_name &&
> 

Reply via email to