On 30/09/2019 22:53, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 9/30/19 12:43 PM, Pavel Begunkov (Silence) wrote:
>> @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ static bool bt_tags_iter(struct sbitmap *bitmap,
>> unsigned int bitnr, void *data)
>> * test and set the bit before assining ->rqs[].
>> */
>> rq = tags->rqs[bitnr];
>> - if (rq && blk_mq_request_started(rq))
>> + if (rq && blk_mq_rq_state(rq) != MQ_RQ_IDLE)
>> return iter_data->fn(rq, iter_data->data, reserved);
>>
>> return true>
>> @@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ static bool blk_mq_tagset_count_completed_rqs(struct
>> request *rq,
>> {
>> unsigned *count = data;
>>
>> - if (blk_mq_request_completed(rq))
>> + if (blk_mq_rq_state(rq) == MQ_RQ_COMPLETE)
>> (*count)++;
>> return true;
>> }
>
> Changes like the above significantly reduce readability of the code in
> the block layer core. I don't like this. I think this patch is a step
> backwards instead of a step forwards.Yep, looks too bulky. Jens, could you consider the first version? -- Yours sincerely, Pavel Begunkov
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
