On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 03:46:35PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 04:48:41PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > - tpm_buf_reset(&buf, TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS, TPM2_CC_GET_RANDOM); > > + tpm_buf_reset(&buf, data_ptr, PAGE_SIZE, > > + TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS, TPM2_CC_PCR_EXTEND); > > Oops.
Maybe we could use random as the probe for TPM version since we anyway send a TPM command as a probe for TPM version: 1. Try TPM2 get random. 2. If fail, try TPM1 get random. 3. Output random number to klog. Something like 8 bytes would be sufficient. This would make sure that no new change breaks tpm_get_random() and also this would give some feedback that TPM is at least somewhat working. /Jarkko
