On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 02:02:19PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The "port->typec_caps.data" and "port->typec_caps.type" variables are
> enums and in this context GCC will treat them as an unsigned int so they
> can never be less than zero.
>
> Fixes: ae8a2ca8a221 ("usb: typec: Group all TCPCI/TCPM code together")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> index 96562744101c..d3b63e000ae2 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> @@ -4410,7 +4410,7 @@ static int tcpm_fw_get_caps(struct tcpm_port *port,
> ret = fwnode_property_read_string(fwnode, "data-role", &cap_str);
> if (ret == 0) {
> port->typec_caps.data = typec_find_port_data_role(cap_str);
> - if (port->typec_caps.data < 0)
> + if ((int)port->typec_caps.data < 0)
> return -EINVAL;
Doesn't that also cause a warning about overwriting error return codes ?
I would prefer something like
ret = typec_find_port_data_role(cap_str);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
port->typec_caps.data = ret;
Guenter
> }
>
> @@ -4419,7 +4419,7 @@ static int tcpm_fw_get_caps(struct tcpm_port *port,
> return ret;
>
> port->typec_caps.type = typec_find_port_power_role(cap_str);
> - if (port->typec_caps.type < 0)
> + if ((int)port->typec_caps.type < 0)
> return -EINVAL;
> port->port_type = port->typec_caps.type;
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
