On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 12:15:38 -0700
Florian Fainelli <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Justin Chen <[email protected]>
> 
> The current l1 controller does not mask any interrupts when dropping
> into suspend. This mean we can receive unexpected wake up sources.
> Modified MIPS l1 controller to mask the all non-wake interrupts before
> dropping into suspend.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Justin Chen <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 98 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c 
> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
> index fc75c61233aa..f5e4ff5251ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  #include <linux/irqchip.h>
>  #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
>  
>  #define IRQS_PER_WORD                32
>  #define REG_BYTES_PER_IRQ_WORD       (sizeof(u32) * 4)
> @@ -39,6 +40,10 @@ struct bcm7038_l1_chip {
>       unsigned int            n_words;
>       struct irq_domain       *domain;
>       struct bcm7038_l1_cpu   *cpus[NR_CPUS];
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +     struct list_head        list;
> +     u32                     wake_mask[MAX_WORDS];
> +#endif
>       u8                      affinity[MAX_WORDS * IRQS_PER_WORD];
>  };
>  
> @@ -47,6 +52,17 @@ struct bcm7038_l1_cpu {
>       u32                     mask_cache[0];
>  };
>  
> +/*
> + * We keep a list of bcm7038_l1_chip used for suspend/resume. This hack is
> + * used because the struct chip_type suspend/resume hooks are not called
> + * unless chip_type is hooked onto a generic_chip. Since this driver does
> + * not use generic_chip, we need to manually hook our resume/suspend to
> + * syscore_ops.
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +static LIST_HEAD(bcm7038_l1_intcs_list);
> +#endif

nit: this could be moved down to be close to the rest of the PM_SLEEP
ifdefery.

> +
>  /*
>   * STATUS/MASK_STATUS/MASK_SET/MASK_CLEAR are packed one right after another:
>   *
> @@ -287,6 +303,77 @@ static int __init bcm7038_l1_init_one(struct device_node 
> *dn,
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +static int bcm7038_l1_suspend(void)
> +{
> +     struct bcm7038_l1_chip *intc;
> +     unsigned long flags;
> +     int boot_cpu, word;
> +
> +     /* Wakeup interrupt should only come from the boot cpu */
> +     boot_cpu = cpu_logical_map(smp_processor_id());

What guarantees that you're actually running on the boot CPU at this
point? If that's actually the case, why isn't cpu_logical_map(0) enough?

> +
> +     list_for_each_entry(intc, &bcm7038_l1_intcs_list, list) {
> +             raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&intc->lock, flags);

And if this can only run on a single CPU, what's the purpose of this
lock?

> +             for (word = 0; word < intc->n_words; word++) {
> +                     l1_writel(~intc->wake_mask[word],
> +                             intc->cpus[boot_cpu]->map_base +
> +                             reg_mask_set(intc, word));
> +                     l1_writel(intc->wake_mask[word],
> +                             intc->cpus[boot_cpu]->map_base +
> +                             reg_mask_clr(intc, word));

nit: Please don't split the write address across two lines, it makes it
harder to read.

> +             }
> +             raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intc->lock, flags);
> +     }
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void bcm7038_l1_resume(void)
> +{
> +     struct bcm7038_l1_chip *intc;
> +     unsigned long flags;
> +     int boot_cpu, word;
> +
> +     boot_cpu = cpu_logical_map(smp_processor_id());
> +
> +     list_for_each_entry(intc, &bcm7038_l1_intcs_list, list) {
> +             raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&intc->lock, flags);
> +             for (word = 0; word < intc->n_words; word++) {
> +                     l1_writel(intc->cpus[boot_cpu]->mask_cache[word],
> +                             intc->cpus[boot_cpu]->map_base +
> +                             reg_mask_set(intc, word));
> +                     l1_writel(~intc->cpus[boot_cpu]->mask_cache[word],
> +                             intc->cpus[boot_cpu]->map_base +
> +                             reg_mask_clr(intc, word));
> +             }
> +             raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intc->lock, flags);
> +     }
> +}
> +
> +static struct syscore_ops bcm7038_l1_syscore_ops = {
> +     .suspend        = bcm7038_l1_suspend,
> +     .resume         = bcm7038_l1_resume,
> +};
> +
> +static int bcm7038_l1_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on)
> +{
> +     struct bcm7038_l1_chip *intc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +     unsigned long flags;
> +     u32 word = d->hwirq / IRQS_PER_WORD;
> +     u32 mask = BIT(d->hwirq % IRQS_PER_WORD);
> +
> +     raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&intc->lock, flags);
> +     if (on)
> +             intc->wake_mask[word] |= mask;
> +     else
> +             intc->wake_mask[word] &= ~mask;
> +     raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intc->lock, flags);
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  static struct irq_chip bcm7038_l1_irq_chip = {
>       .name                   = "bcm7038-l1",
>       .irq_mask               = bcm7038_l1_mask,
> @@ -295,6 +382,9 @@ static struct irq_chip bcm7038_l1_irq_chip = {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>       .irq_cpu_offline        = bcm7038_l1_cpu_offline,
>  #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +     .irq_set_wake           = bcm7038_l1_set_wake,
> +#endif
>  };
>  
>  static int bcm7038_l1_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
> @@ -340,6 +430,14 @@ int __init bcm7038_l1_of_init(struct device_node *dn,
>               goto out_unmap;
>       }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +     /* Add bcm7038_l1_chip into a list */
> +     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&intc->list);
> +     list_add_tail(&intc->list, &bcm7038_l1_intcs_list);

No locking to manipulate this list? Is that safe?

> +
> +     register_syscore_ops(&bcm7038_l1_syscore_ops);

Do you really register the syscore_ops for each and every L1 irqchip?

> +#endif
> +
>       pr_info("registered BCM7038 L1 intc (%pOF, IRQs: %d)\n",
>               dn, IRQS_PER_WORD * intc->n_words);
>  

Thanks,

        M.
-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

Reply via email to