Hi Chris,
On 12/07/2019 04:49, Chris Packham wrote:
> The Armada 38x and other integrated SoCs use a reduced pin count so the
> width of the SDRAM interface is smaller than the Armada XP SoCs. This
> means that the definition of "full" and "half" width is reduced from
> 64/32 to 32/16.
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/armada_xp_edac.c b/drivers/edac/armada_xp_edac.c
> index 3759a4fbbdee..7f227bdcbc84 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/armada_xp_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/armada_xp_edac.c
> @@ -332,6 +332,11 @@ static int axp_mc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> axp_mc_read_config(mci);
>
> + /* These SoCs have a reduced width bus */
> + if (of_machine_is_compatible("marvell,armada380") ||
> + of_machine_is_compatible("marvell,armadaxp-98dx3236"))
> + drvdata->width /= 2;
So the hardware's SDRAM_CONFIG_BUS_WIDTH value is wrong? Yuck.
Is it too late for the DTs on these two systems to provide a DT version of the
'bus_width'
to override the hardware's mis-advertised value?
This way you don't need to grow this list.
Acked-by: James Morse <[email protected]>
Thanks,
James
