Now that we build with -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3, some warnings are
produced in the arch/mips perf events code that are promoted to errors:

 arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c:792:3: error: this statement may fall 
through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=]
 arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c:795:3: error: this statement may fall 
through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=]
 arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c:798:3: error: this statement may fall 
through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=]
 arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c:1407:6: error: this statement may fall 
through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=]

Assume the fall throughs are deliberate amd annotate/eliminate them.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
---
 arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

I haven't even build tested this, sorry, but will add it to linux-next
tomorrow.  It should be no worse than the current state :-)

diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c 
b/arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c
index e0ebaa0a333e..40106731e97e 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/perf_event_mipsxx.c
@@ -790,15 +790,19 @@ static void reset_counters(void *arg)
        case 4:
                mipsxx_pmu_write_control(3, 0);
                mipspmu.write_counter(3, 0);
+               /* fall through */
        case 3:
                mipsxx_pmu_write_control(2, 0);
                mipspmu.write_counter(2, 0);
+               /* fall through */
        case 2:
                mipsxx_pmu_write_control(1, 0);
                mipspmu.write_counter(1, 0);
+               /* fall through */
        case 1:
                mipsxx_pmu_write_control(0, 0);
                mipspmu.write_counter(0, 0);
+               /* fall through */
        }
 }
 
@@ -1379,7 +1383,7 @@ static int mipsxx_pmu_handle_shared_irq(void)
        struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
        struct perf_sample_data data;
        unsigned int counters = mipspmu.num_counters;
-       u64 counter;
+       unsigned int n;
        int handled = IRQ_NONE;
        struct pt_regs *regs;
 
@@ -1401,20 +1405,16 @@ static int mipsxx_pmu_handle_shared_irq(void)
 
        perf_sample_data_init(&data, 0, 0);
 
-       switch (counters) {
-#define HANDLE_COUNTER(n)                                              \
-       case n + 1:                                                     \
-               if (test_bit(n, cpuc->used_mask)) {                     \
-                       counter = mipspmu.read_counter(n);              \
-                       if (counter & mipspmu.overflow) {               \
-                               handle_associated_event(cpuc, n, &data, regs); \
-                               handled = IRQ_HANDLED;                  \
-                       }                                               \
+       for (n = (counters > 4) ? 3 : (counters - 1); n >= 0; n--) {
+               u64 counter;
+
+               if (test_bit(n, cpuc->used_mask)) {
+                       counter = mipspmu.read_counter(n);
+                       if (counter & mipspmu.overflow) {
+                               handle_associated_event(cpuc, n, &data, regs);
+                               handled = IRQ_HANDLED;
+                       }
                }
-       HANDLE_COUNTER(3)
-       HANDLE_COUNTER(2)
-       HANDLE_COUNTER(1)
-       HANDLE_COUNTER(0)
        }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MIPS_PERF_SHARED_TC_COUNTERS
-- 
2.22.0

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgpimqic7ysI8.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to