On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:10:02PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hi Jirka, > > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:00:15PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 04:47:54PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > Em Wed, May 08, 2019 at 03:19:59PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > > > > Moving file specific code in dso__data_file_size function > > > > into separate file_size function. I'll add bpf specific > > > > code in following patches. > > > > > > I'm applying this patch, as it just moves things around, no logic > > > change, but can you please clarify a question I have after looking at > > > this patch? > > > > > > > Link: > > > > http://lkml.kernel.org/n/[email protected] > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> > > > > --- > > > > tools/perf/util/dso.c | 19 ++++++++++++------- > > > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/dso.c b/tools/perf/util/dso.c > > > > index e059976d9d93..cb6199c1390a 100644 > > > > --- a/tools/perf/util/dso.c > > > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/dso.c > > > > @@ -898,18 +898,12 @@ static ssize_t cached_read(struct dso *dso, > > > > struct machine *machine, > > > > return r; > > > > } > > > > > > > > -int dso__data_file_size(struct dso *dso, struct machine *machine) > > > > +static int file_size(struct dso *dso, struct machine *machine) > > > > { > > > > int ret = 0; > > > > struct stat st; > > > > char sbuf[STRERR_BUFSIZE]; > > > > > > > > - if (dso->data.file_size) > > > > - return 0; > > > > - > > > > - if (dso->data.status == DSO_DATA_STATUS_ERROR) > > > > - return -1; > > > > - > > > > pthread_mutex_lock(&dso__data_open_lock); > > > > > > > > /* > > > > @@ -938,6 +932,17 @@ int dso__data_file_size(struct dso *dso, struct > > > > machine *machine) > > > > return ret; > > > > } > > > > > > > > +int dso__data_file_size(struct dso *dso, struct machine *machine) > > > > +{ > > > > + if (dso->data.file_size) > > > > + return 0; > > > > + > > > > + if (dso->data.status == DSO_DATA_STATUS_ERROR) > > > > + return -1; > > > > + > > > > + return file_size(dso, machine); > > > > +} > > > > > > > > > So the name of the function suggests we want to know the > > > "data_file_size" of a dso, then the logic in it returns _zero_ if a > > > member named "dso->data.file_size" is _not_ zero, can you please > > > clarify? > > > > > > I was expecting something like: > > > > > > if (dso->data.file_size) > > > return dso->data.file_size; > > > > > > I.e. if we had already read it, return the cached value, otherwise go > > > and call some other function to get that info somehow. > > > > we keep the data size in dso->data.file_size, > > the function just updates it > > > > the return code is the error code.. not sure, > > why its like that, but it is ;-) > > > > maybe we wanted separate size and error code, > > because the size needs to be u64 and we use > > int everywhere.. less casting > > Maybe we can rename it to dso__update_file_size().
sounds good, I'll queue it thanks, jirka
