On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 08:36:49PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 04:44:19PM -0600, shuah wrote: > > Hi Sasha and Dhaval, > > > > On 4/11/19 11:37 AM, Dhaval Giani wrote: > > > Hi Folks, > > > > > > This is a call for participation for the Linux Testing microconference > > > at LPC this year. > > > > > > For those who were at LPC last year, as the closing panel mentioned, > > > testing is probably the next big push needed to improve quality. From > > > getting more selftests in, to regression testing to ensure we don't > > > break realtime as more of PREEMPT_RT comes in, to more stable distros, > > > we need more testing around the kernel. > > > > > > We have talked about different efforts around testing, such as fuzzing > > > (using syzkaller and trinity), automating fuzzing with syzbot, 0day > > > testing, test frameworks such as ktests, smatch to find bugs in the > > > past. We want to push this discussion further this year and are > > > interested in hearing from you what you want to talk about, and where > > > kernel testing needs to go next. > > > > > > Please let us know what topics you believe should be a part of the > > > micro conference this year. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > Sasha and Dhaval > > > > > > > A talk on KUnit from Brendan Higgins will be good addition to this > > Micro-conference. I am cc'ing Brendan on this thread. > > > > Please consider adding it. > > FWIW, the topic of unit tests is already on the schedule. There seems to > be two different sub-topics here (kunit vs KTF) so there's a good > discussion to be had here on many levels.
Cool, so do we just want to go with that? Have a single slot for KUnit and KTF combined? We can each present our work up to this point; maybe offer some background and rationale on why we made the decision we have and then we can have some moderated discussion on, pros, cons, next steps, etc? Cheers
