Hi Arndt,

-----Original Message-----
From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> 
Sent: 2019年5月17日 16:59
To: Xiaowei Bao <[email protected]>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>; Rob Herring <[email protected]>; Mark 
Rutland <[email protected]>; Shawn Guo <[email protected]>; Leo Li 
<[email protected]>; Kishon <[email protected]>; Lorenzo Pieralisi 
<[email protected]>; gregkh <[email protected]>; M.h. Lian 
<[email protected]>; Mingkai Hu <[email protected]>; Roy Zang 
<[email protected]>; Kate Stewart <[email protected]>; Philippe 
Ombredanne <[email protected]>; Shawn Lin <[email protected]>; 
linux-pci <[email protected]>; DTML <[email protected]>; Linux 
Kernel Mailing List <[email protected]>; Linux ARM 
<[email protected]>; linuxppc-dev 
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: ls1028a: Add PCIe controller DT 
nodes

Caution: EXT Email

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 5:21 AM Xiaowei Bao <[email protected]> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 9:36 AM Xiaowei Bao <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi |   52 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi 
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> > index b045812..50b579b 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> > @@ -398,6 +398,58 @@
> >                         status = "disabled";
> >                 };
> >
> > +               pcie@3400000 {
> > +                       compatible = "fsl,ls1028a-pcie";
> > +                       reg = <0x00 0x03400000 0x0 0x00100000   /* 
> > controller registers */
> > +                              0x80 0x00000000 0x0 0x00002000>; /* 
> > configuration space */
> > +                       reg-names = "regs", "config";
> > +                       interrupts = <GIC_SPI 108 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, /* 
> > PME interrupt */
> > +                                    <GIC_SPI 109 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; /* 
> > aer interrupt */
> > +                       interrupt-names = "pme", "aer";
> > +                       #address-cells = <3>;
> > +                       #size-cells = <2>;
> > +                       device_type = "pci";
> > +                       dma-coherent;
> > +                       num-lanes = <4>;
> > +                       bus-range = <0x0 0xff>;
> > +                       ranges = <0x81000000 0x0 0x00000000 0x80 0x00010000 
> > 0x0 0x00010000   /* downstream I/O */
> > +                                 0x82000000 0x0 0x40000000 0x80 
> > + 0x40000000 0x0 0x40000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */
>
> Are you sure there is no support for 64-bit BARs or prefetchable memory?
> [Xiaowei Bao] sorry for late reply, Thought that our Layerscape platform has 
> not added prefetchable memory support in DTS, so this platform has not been 
> added, I will submit a separate patch to add prefetchable memory support for 
> all Layerscape platforms.

Ok, thanks.

> Of course, the prefetchable PCIE device can work in our boards, 
> because the RC will assign non-prefetchable memory for this device. We 
> reserve 1G no-prefetchable memory for PCIE device, it is enough for general 
> devices.

Sure, many devices work just fine, this is mostly a question of supporting 
those devices that do require multiple gigabytes, or that need prefetchable 
memory semantics to get the expected performance. GPUs are the obvious example, 
but I think there are others (infiniband?).
[Xiaowei Bao] sorry, I don't know much about infiniband and GPU, as you said, I 
think many devices works fine with this DTS, I will add the prefetchable memory 
entry in DTS future and submit another patch.

      Arnd

Reply via email to