Am Sonntag, den 31.03.2019, 21:25 -0700 schrieb Andrey Smirnov:
> Simplify pcie_phy_poll_ack() by incorporating shifting into constant
> definition and convert the code to use 'bool'. No functional change
> intended.
> 
> > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Chris Healy <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Lucas Stach <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Leonard Crestez <[email protected]>
> > Cc: "A.s. Dong" <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Richard Zhu <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> > Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c 
> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> index a49e5e491e12..7c3ffb751002 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ struct imx6_pcie {
> >  #define PCIE_PHY_CTRL_RD           BIT(19)
>  
>  #define PCIE_PHY_STAT (PL_OFFSET + 0x110)
> -#define PCIE_PHY_STAT_ACK_LOC 16
> > +#define PCIE_PHY_STAT_ACK          BIT(16)
>  
> >  #define PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL      0x80C
>  
> @@ -151,16 +151,16 @@ struct imx6_pcie {
> >  #define PHY_RX_OVRD_IN_LO_RX_DATA_EN               BIT(5)
> >  #define PHY_RX_OVRD_IN_LO_RX_PLL_EN                BIT(3)
>  
> -static int pcie_phy_poll_ack(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie, int exp_val)
> +static int pcie_phy_poll_ack(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie, bool exp_val)

This looks like only going half the way to me. The parameter type is
changed to bool, but the callers still use 0 and 1 directly. If we use
bool here the callers should be changed to true/false.

>  {
>       struct dw_pcie *pci = imx6_pcie->pci;
> -     u32 val;
> +     bool val;
>       u32 max_iterations = 10;
>       u32 wait_counter = 0;
>  
>       do {
> -             val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_PHY_STAT);
> -             val = (val >> PCIE_PHY_STAT_ACK_LOC) & 0x1;
> +             val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_PHY_STAT) &
> +                     PCIE_PHY_STAT_ACK;

I think this needs to be
val = !!(dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_PHY_STAT) & PCIE_PHY_STAT_ACK);
as the ACK bit isn't shifted down into bit position 0 anymore.

>               wait_counter++;
>  
> >             if (val == exp_val)

Reply via email to