On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 7:56 PM Mimi Zohar <[email protected]> wrote: > The kexec and kernel modules patches in this patch set continues to > ignore IMA. This patch set should up front either provide an > alternative solution to coordinate the different signature > verification methods or rely on the architecture specific policy for > that coordination.
Hi Mimi, I'm working on a patch for this at the moment which can then be added to either patchset. Is there a tree that contains the proposed Power architecture policy? I want to make sure I don't accidentally end up depending on anything x86.
