The patch

   regulator: s2mpa01: Fix step values for some LDOs

has been applied to the regulator tree at

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From 28c4f730d2a44f2591cb104091da29a38dac49fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stuart Menefy <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:51:18 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: s2mpa01: Fix step values for some LDOs

The step values for some of the LDOs appears to be incorrect, resulting
in incorrect voltages (or at least, ones which are different from the
Samsung 3.4 vendor kernel).

Signed-off-by: Stuart Menefy <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
---
 drivers/regulator/s2mpa01.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/s2mpa01.c b/drivers/regulator/s2mpa01.c
index 095d25f3d2ea..58a1fe583a6c 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/s2mpa01.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/s2mpa01.c
@@ -298,13 +298,13 @@ static const struct regulator_desc regulators[] = {
        regulator_desc_ldo(2, STEP_50_MV),
        regulator_desc_ldo(3, STEP_50_MV),
        regulator_desc_ldo(4, STEP_50_MV),
-       regulator_desc_ldo(5, STEP_50_MV),
+       regulator_desc_ldo(5, STEP_25_MV),
        regulator_desc_ldo(6, STEP_25_MV),
        regulator_desc_ldo(7, STEP_50_MV),
        regulator_desc_ldo(8, STEP_50_MV),
        regulator_desc_ldo(9, STEP_50_MV),
        regulator_desc_ldo(10, STEP_50_MV),
-       regulator_desc_ldo(11, STEP_25_MV),
+       regulator_desc_ldo(11, STEP_50_MV),
        regulator_desc_ldo(12, STEP_50_MV),
        regulator_desc_ldo(13, STEP_50_MV),
        regulator_desc_ldo(14, STEP_50_MV),
@@ -315,11 +315,11 @@ static const struct regulator_desc regulators[] = {
        regulator_desc_ldo(19, STEP_50_MV),
        regulator_desc_ldo(20, STEP_50_MV),
        regulator_desc_ldo(21, STEP_50_MV),
-       regulator_desc_ldo(22, STEP_25_MV),
-       regulator_desc_ldo(23, STEP_25_MV),
+       regulator_desc_ldo(22, STEP_50_MV),
+       regulator_desc_ldo(23, STEP_50_MV),
        regulator_desc_ldo(24, STEP_50_MV),
        regulator_desc_ldo(25, STEP_50_MV),
-       regulator_desc_ldo(26, STEP_50_MV),
+       regulator_desc_ldo(26, STEP_25_MV),
        regulator_desc_buck1_4(1),
        regulator_desc_buck1_4(2),
        regulator_desc_buck1_4(3),
-- 
2.20.1

Reply via email to