WARN_ON() already contains an unlikely(), so it's not necessary to wrap it
into another.

Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
---
 kernel/seccomp.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
index fd023ac24e10..5a2a9af4663e 100644
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static u32 seccomp_run_filters(const struct seccomp_data 
*sd,
                        READ_ONCE(current->seccomp.filter);
 
        /* Ensure unexpected behavior doesn't result in failing open. */
-       if (unlikely(WARN_ON(f == NULL)))
+       if (WARN_ON(f == NULL))
                return SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS;
 
        if (!sd) {
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static inline pid_t seccomp_can_sync_threads(void)
                /* Return the first thread that cannot be synchronized. */
                failed = task_pid_vnr(thread);
                /* If the pid cannot be resolved, then return -ESRCH */
-               if (unlikely(WARN_ON(failed == 0)))
+               if (WARN_ON(failed == 0))
                        failed = -ESRCH;
                return failed;
        }
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to