[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> > Is there some hope that at least the Linux kernel interface definition
> > files and
> > everything recursively included from these files will be rewritten in
> > vanilla
> > ANSI C?
>
> this has been discussed many times and the answer is that the kernel is
> not gong to change it's side of things to ANSI C.
>
> that doesn't mean that one of the many projects out there to create
> seperate interface headers won't do this.
The main problems are not really hard to fix......
- Most problems eem to be related to the fact that Linux does not
use C-99 based types in the kernel and the related type definitions
are not written in plain C. This is something that should be fixed
with a source consolidation program or by defining aliases to
C-99 types in case the compiler is not GCC.
- Other problems are caused by additional tag definitions that could
be disabled in case of a non-GCC compile.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
