Commit-ID:  4749f8196452eeb73cf2086a6a9705bae479d33d
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/4749f8196452eeb73cf2086a6a9705bae479d33d
Author:     Kan Liang <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Thu, 3 May 2018 11:25:08 -0700
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
CommitDate: Thu, 31 May 2018 12:36:28 +0200

perf/x86/intel/uncore: Correct fixed counter index check in generic code

There is no index which is bigger than UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED. The only
exception is client IMC uncore, which has been specially handled.
For generic code, it is not correct to use >= to check fixed counter.
The code quality issue will bring problem when a new counter index is
introduced.

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
index a7956fc7ca1d..3b0f93eb3cc0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ void uncore_perf_event_update(struct intel_uncore_box *box, 
struct perf_event *e
        u64 prev_count, new_count, delta;
        int shift;
 
-       if (event->hw.idx >= UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED)
+       if (event->hw.idx == UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED)
                shift = 64 - uncore_fixed_ctr_bits(box);
        else
                shift = 64 - uncore_perf_ctr_bits(box);

Reply via email to