On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Marek Vasut <[email protected]> wrote:
> The model number stored in the struct da9063 is the same for all
> variants of the da9063 since it is the chip ID, which is always
> the same. Replace that with a separate identifier instead, which
> allows us to discern the DA9063 variants by setting the type
> based on either DT match or otherwise.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>

> --- a/drivers/mfd/da9063-i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/da9063-i2c.c
> @@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ static int da9063_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
>         i2c_set_clientdata(i2c, da9063);
>         da9063->dev = &i2c->dev;
>         da9063->chip_irq = i2c->irq;
> +       da9063->type = (enum da9063_type)id->driver_data;

Nit: I think this cast (from unsigned long) is not needed.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Reply via email to