Hi! > > > > @@ -499,6 +500,7 @@ static void flush_to_ldisc(struct work_struct *work) > > > > struct tty_buffer *head = buf->head; > > > > struct tty_buffer *next; > > > > int count; > > > > + unsigned long delay = 50 /* ms */; > > > > > > Comment after the semicolon? > > > > Given that this comment is about the 50 and not the delay member, I > > prefer it before the ;. > > Hmm. I personally find it hard to read and can only find about 30 > instances of this comment style (for assignments) in the kernel. And > arguably the comment applies equally well to the delay variable in this > case too.
It is not too traditional, but I believe it makes sense....
(and yes, I wish we had kernel in Rust, so we could have real units
attached to our variables...)
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
