2018-04-04 19:54 GMT+08:00 David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>:
> On 04.04.2018 01:28, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> From: Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
>>
>> Introduce handle_ud() to handle invalid opcode, this function will be
>> used by later patches.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <[email protected]>
>> Reviewed-by: Liran Alon <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Radim Krčmář <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Andrew Cooper <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Liran Alon <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 9 +--------
>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 10 ++--------
>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.h | 2 ++
>> 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> index f66fc2e..e0a3f56 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> @@ -2676,14 +2676,7 @@ static int bp_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>>
>> static int ud_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>> {
>> - int er;
>> -
>> - er = emulate_instruction(&svm->vcpu, EMULTYPE_TRAP_UD);
>> - if (er == EMULATE_USER_EXIT)
>> - return 0;
>> - if (er != EMULATE_DONE)
>> - kvm_queue_exception(&svm->vcpu, UD_VECTOR);
>> - return 1;
>> + return handle_ud(&svm->vcpu);
>> }
>>
>> static int ac_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> index b2f8a70..0f11243 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> @@ -6436,14 +6436,8 @@ static int handle_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> if (is_nmi(intr_info))
>> return 1; /* already handled by vmx_vcpu_run() */
>>
>> - if (is_invalid_opcode(intr_info)) {
>> - er = emulate_instruction(vcpu, EMULTYPE_TRAP_UD);
>> - if (er == EMULATE_USER_EXIT)
>> - return 0;
>> - if (er != EMULATE_DONE)
>> - kvm_queue_exception(vcpu, UD_VECTOR);
>> - return 1;
>> - }
>> + if (is_invalid_opcode(intr_info))
>> + return handle_ud(vcpu);
>
> (maybe different on this branch) isn't "er" now unused?
Hmm, It is used in other place of the function handle_exception.
>
>>
>> error_code = 0;
>> if (intr_info & INTR_INFO_DELIVER_CODE_MASK)
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> index 7d9a444..1eb495e 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> @@ -4840,6 +4840,19 @@ int kvm_write_guest_virt_system(struct
>> x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_write_guest_virt_system);
>>
>> +int handle_ud(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> + enum emulation_result er;
>> +
>> + er = emulate_instruction(vcpu, EMULTYPE_TRAP_UD);
>> + if (er == EMULATE_USER_EXIT)
>> + return 0;
>> + if (er != EMULATE_DONE)
>> + kvm_queue_exception(vcpu, UD_VECTOR);
>> + return 1;
>
> I would now actually prefer
>
> if (er == EMULATE_DONE)
> return 1 ...
Keep the original one I think.
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
