* Dominik Brodowski <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > The whole series is available at
> > >
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brodo/linux.git
> > > syscalls-WIP
> >
> > BTW., I'd like all these bits to go through the x86 tree.
> >
> > What is the expected merge route of the generic preparatory bits?
>
> My current plan is to push the 109 patch bomb to remove in-kernel calls to
> syscalls
> directly to Linus once v4.16 is released.
Are there any (textual and semantic) conflicts with the latest -next?
Also, to what extent were these 109 patches tested in -next?
> For this series of seven patches, I am content with them going upstream
> through
> the x86 tree (once that contains a backmerge of Linus' tree or the syscalls
> tree, obviously). IMO, these seven patches should be kept together, and not
> routed upstream through different channels.
Of course they should stay together - the generic code impact is minimal, these
are 95% x86.
Thanks,
Ingo
