Thanks David We are aware and it is working properly Yan Markman
-----Original Message----- From: David Miller [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 8:16 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Yan Markman <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Nadav Haklai <[email protected]>; Stefan Chulski <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net-next] net: mvpp2: Use relaxed I/O in data path External Email ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Maxime Chevallier <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 16:49:05 +0200 > From: Yan Markman <[email protected]> > > Use relaxed I/O on the hot path. This achieves significant performance > improvements. On a 10G link, this makes a basic iperf TCP test go from > an average of 4.5 Gbits/sec to about 9.40 Gbits/sec. > > Signed-off-by: Yan Markman <[email protected]> > [Maxime: Commit message, cosmetic changes] > Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <[email protected]> > --- > David, this patch should not conflict with other the pending PPv2 > series I sent earlier ("[PATCH net-next 0/2] net: mvpp2: Remove > unnecessary dynamic allocs") Applied, but it is up to you to make sure the correct barriers are in place such that undesirable memory and IOMEM operation reordering does not occur. Said another way, you get to keep the pieces if this breaks things :-)
