Bummer. :-(
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> wrote:
> + if (drv->states[idx].flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_POLLING) {
> + *nohz_ret = false;
> + } else if (drv->states[idx].target_residency < TICK_USEC) {
> + /*
> + * Do not stop the tick if there is at least one more state
> + * within the tick period range that could be used if longer
> + * idle duration was predicted.
> + */
> + *nohz_ret = first_idx > idx &&
> + drv->states[first_idx].target_residency <
> TICK_USEC;
This is reversed, sent a wrong version of the patch.
I'll resend with this fixed shortly.
