On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 11:49:55 +0900 Sergey Senozhatsky <[email protected]> wrote:
> Another problem, and I mentioned it somewhere in another email, is that > upstream printk people don't receive enough [if any at all] feedback from > guys who face printk issues. That's why every time printk_kthread re-surfaces > the reaction is "this is not a real problem, no one is seeing printk issues > like these, you idiot!". It'd be great to have more "we need ABC, because of > XYZ, but printk crashes the system. Here is the backtrace, fix it" reports. > As of now, those things mostly are not reported, that's why people are not > convinced. Just my 5 cents. If you are seeing these issues, have whoever is reporting them to Cc LKML, and those of us that would care to listen. -- Steve
