Hi Borislav, [+ tglx] On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 02:39:52PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > From: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> > > Keep the "nopti" for traditional reasons. > > Requested-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> > Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> > Cc: Andy Lutomirsky <[email protected]> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> > Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> > Cc: Greg KH <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]> > Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> > Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> > Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <[email protected]> > Cc: Juergen Gross <[email protected]> > Cc: David Laight <[email protected]> > Cc: Eduardo Valentin <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > --- > Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 6 ++++++ > arch/x86/mm/pti.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
On arm64, I've gone for kpti=. I'm happy to change this to align with x86, but the patches are queued now so I don't want to keep changing it. Is "pti=" definitely what you're going for on x86? Will
