3.16.49-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Zefan Li <[email protected]>

commit a2b86f772227bcaf962c8b134f8d187046ac5f0e upstream.

Commit 1d4457f99928 ("sched: move no_new_privs into new atomic flags")
defined PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS as hexadecimal value, but it is confusing
because it is used as bit number. Redefine it as decimal bit number.

Note this changes the bit position of PFA_NOW_NEW_PRIVS from 1 to 0.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Miao Xie <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
[ lizf: slightly modified subject and changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
---
 include/linux/sched.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1979,7 +1979,7 @@ static inline void memalloc_noio_restore
 }
 
 /* Per-process atomic flags. */
-#define PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS 0x00000001    /* May not gain new privileges. */
+#define PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS 0     /* May not gain new privileges. */
 
 static inline bool task_no_new_privs(struct task_struct *p)
 {

Reply via email to