We need a reliable stack unwinder for kernel live patching, but we do
not want to enable frame pointers for performance reasons. So let ORC be
a reliable stack unwinder on x86 as it performs nicely wrt reliability
of traces.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
---

I am sending this as an RFC. Do you still consider ORC to be not-enough
reliable?

 arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 063f1e0d51aa..7403267407fc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ config X86
        select HAVE_PERF_USER_STACK_DUMP
        select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE
        select HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API
-       select HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE         if X86_64 && 
FRAME_POINTER_UNWINDER && STACK_VALIDATION
+       select HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE         if X86_64 && 
(FRAME_POINTER_UNWINDER || ORC_UNWINDER) && STACK_VALIDATION
        select HAVE_STACK_VALIDATION            if X86_64
        select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
        select HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK
-- 
2.14.2

Reply via email to