On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:34 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 01:33:13AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> >> >> It should not be necessary to resume devices with ignore_children set >> in pci_pm_prepare(), because they should be resumed explcitly by > > s/explcitly/explicitly/
Yup. >> their children drivers during suspend if need be and they will be >> resumed by pci_pm_suspend() after that anyway, so avoid doing that. >> >> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> > > Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> > > I think your previous patches to this file mostly used a "PCI / PM" > subject line prefix (as opposed to the "PM / PCI" here). But maybe > the difference means something? No, it doesn't. I'll change it to match the previous ones. :-) Thanks, Rafael
