On 09/17/2017 10:08 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
...

+
+extern struct static_key_false __sev;
+static inline bool __sev_active(void)
+{
+       return static_branch_unlikely(&__sev);
+}

I'm still not happy about the two's sev_active() and __sev_active()
naming. Perhaps the __ variant should be called sev_key_active() or ...


Will rename it to sev_key_active() in next rev.

-Brijesh

Reply via email to