On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:56:13AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:33:54AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Vinod Koul <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:07:59PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: > > > why fail, debugfs should be an optional thingy, why would you want to > > > fail here? > > > > Yes, we are handling the case when debugfs is not available > > and skipping debugfs gracefully. > > > > If debugfs is available then failure of debugfs_create_dir() > > should be reported. > > reported yes, bailing out on that err no..
Reported, no. You should _never_ care about the return value of a debugfs call. Never check it, just move on ad keep on going. It doesn't matter. thanks, greg k-h
