From: Thomas Garnier <[email protected]>

Use CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION instead of BUG_ON to provide more flexibility
on address limit failures. By default, send a SIGKILL signal to kill the
current process preventing exploitation of a bad address limit.

Make the TIF_FSCHECK flag optional so ARM can use this function.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
---
 include/linux/syscalls.h | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/syscalls.h b/include/linux/syscalls.h
index 88951b795ee3..65e273aadada 100644
--- a/include/linux/syscalls.h
+++ b/include/linux/syscalls.h
@@ -219,21 +219,25 @@ static inline int is_syscall_trace_event(struct 
trace_event_call *tp_event)
        }                                                               \
        static inline long SYSC##name(__MAP(x,__SC_DECL,__VA_ARGS__))
 
-#ifdef TIF_FSCHECK
 /*
  * Called before coming back to user-mode. Returning to user-mode with an
  * address limit different than USER_DS can allow to overwrite kernel memory.
  */
 static inline void addr_limit_user_check(void)
 {
-
+#ifdef TIF_FSCHECK
        if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_FSCHECK))
                return;
+#endif
 
-       BUG_ON(!segment_eq(get_fs(), USER_DS));
+       if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(!segment_eq(get_fs(), USER_DS),
+                                 "Invalid address limit on user-mode return"))
+               force_sig(SIGKILL, current);
+
+#ifdef TIF_FSCHECK
        clear_thread_flag(TIF_FSCHECK);
-}
 #endif
+}
 
 asmlinkage long sys32_quotactl(unsigned int cmd, const char __user *special,
                               qid_t id, void __user *addr);
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to