On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 07:01:13PM -0700, Arun Kalyanasundaram wrote: > The process_event python hook receives a dict with most perf_sample > entries.
hi, was there any change to the rfc post? thanks, jirka > > Other handlers (e.g. trace_unhandled, python_process_tracepoint) predate > the introduction of this dict and do not receive it. This patch series > adds the dict to all handlers, aiming to unify the information passed to > them. > > This change adds an additional argument to the affected handlers. To > keep backwards compatibility (and avoid unnecessary work), do not pass > the aforementioned dict if the number of arguments signals that handler > version predates this change. > > In addition, provide time_enabled, time_running and counter value in the > perf_sample dict. > > Initial Discussion: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/1/108 > > Arun Kalyanasundaram (5): > perf script python: Allocate memory only if handler exists > perf script python: Refactor creation of perf sample dict > perf script python: Add sample_read to dict > perf script python: Add perf_sample dict to tracepoint handlers > perf script python: Generate hooks with additional argument > > .../util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c | 246 > +++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 184 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.14.0.rc0.284.gd933b75aa4-goog >
