On Sat 2017-07-15 09:48:53, Julia Lawall wrote: > for_each_child_of_node performs an of_node_get on each iteration, so a > return from the loop requires an of_node_put. > > The semantic patch that fixes this problem is as follows > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr): > > // <smpl> > @@ > local idexpression n; > expression e,e1; > iterator name for_each_child_of_node; > @@ > > for_each_child_of_node(e1,n) { > ... > ( > of_node_put(n); > | > e = n > | > return n; > | > + of_node_put(n); > ? return ...; > ) > ... > } > // </smpl> > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <[email protected]> > @@ -230,12 +230,18 @@ tlc591xx_probe(struct i2c_client *client > > for_each_child_of_node(np, child) { > err = of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", ®); > - if (err) > + if (err) { > + of_node_put(child); > return err; > - if (reg < 0 || reg >= tlc591xx->max_leds) > + } > + if (reg < 0 || reg >= tlc591xx->max_leds) { > + of_node_put(child); > return -EINVAL; > - if (priv->leds[reg].active) > + } > + if (priv->leds[reg].active) { > + of_node_put(child); > return -EINVAL; > + } I'd combine last two if()s into one... Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
