On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 12:44:50PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think I should put wait_lock after wait_list, so as to get a better > > packing on most 64-bit architectures. > > It makes no difference. struct lockdep_map contains at least one pointer and > so is going to be 8-byte aligned (assuming it's there at all). struct > rw_semaphore contains at least one pointer/long, so it will be padded out to > 8-byte size.
I hope people are not going to enabled lockdep on their production systems :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
