On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 3:57 AM, Miroslav Lichvar <[email protected]> wrote: > When the first timestamp in the list of clock readings was later than > the second timestamp and all other timestamps were in order, the > inconsistency was not reported because the index of the out-of-order > timestamp was equal to the default value. > > Cc: John Stultz <[email protected]> > Cc: Prarit Bhargava <[email protected]> > Cc: Richard Cochran <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Miroslav Lichvar <[email protected]>
Queued up in my tree for testing, targeting 4.13. thanks -john
