On 2017년 05월 23일 18:43, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi Arvind,
> 
> On 2017년 05월 19일 19:50, Arvind Yadav wrote:
>> clk_prepare_enable() can fail here and we must check its return value.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  drivers/devfreq/event/exynos-nocp.c | 6 +++++-
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/event/exynos-nocp.c 
>> b/drivers/devfreq/event/exynos-nocp.c
>> index 5c3e7b1..f6e7956 100644
>> --- a/drivers/devfreq/event/exynos-nocp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/event/exynos-nocp.c
>> @@ -267,7 +267,11 @@ static int exynos_nocp_probe(struct platform_device 
>> *pdev)
>>      }
>>      platform_set_drvdata(pdev, nocp);
>>  
>> -    clk_prepare_enable(nocp->clk);
>> +    ret = clk_prepare_enable(nocp->clk);
>> +    if (ret) {
>> +            dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to prepare ppmu clock\n");
>> +            return ret;
>> +    }
> 
> I already replied from the similar patch. Thanks.
> 
>>  
>>      pr_info("exynos-nocp: new NoC Probe device registered: %s\n",
>>                      dev_name(dev));
>>
> 
> 

I'm missing some point that if there is no clock
this driver initializes 'nocp->clk = NULL;' on 217 line.

Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <[email protected]>

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

Reply via email to