4.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Alex Williamson <[email protected]>

commit 93a15b58cfb8a24e666ffca432f19fe65c1cd7d1 upstream.

The kvmgt code keeps a pointer to the struct kvm associated with the
device, but doesn't actually hold a reference to it.  If we do unclean
shutdown testing (ie. killing the user process), then we can see the
kvm association to the device unset, which causes kvmgt to trigger a
device release via a work queue.  Naturally we cannot guarantee that
the cached struct kvm pointer is still valid at this point without
holding a reference.  The observed failure in this case is a stuck
cpu trying to acquire the spinlock from the invalid reference, but
other failure modes are clearly possible.  Hold a reference to avoid
this.

Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <[email protected]>
Cc: Jike Song <[email protected]>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
Cc: Zhenyu Wang <[email protected]>
Cc: Zhi Wang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jike Song <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
@@ -1334,6 +1334,7 @@ static int kvmgt_guest_init(struct mdev_
        vgpu->handle = (unsigned long)info;
        info->vgpu = vgpu;
        info->kvm = kvm;
+       kvm_get_kvm(info->kvm);
 
        kvmgt_protect_table_init(info);
        gvt_cache_init(vgpu);
@@ -1353,6 +1354,7 @@ static bool kvmgt_guest_exit(struct kvmg
        }
 
        kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier(info->kvm, &info->track_node);
+       kvm_put_kvm(info->kvm);
        kvmgt_protect_table_destroy(info);
        gvt_cache_destroy(info->vgpu);
        vfree(info);


Reply via email to