On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 10:33:34 -0800
Cong Wang <[email protected]> wrote:

> posix_acl_update_mode() could possibly clear 'acl', if so
> we leak the memory pointed by 'acl'. Save this pointer
> before calling posix_acl_update_mode() and release the memory
> if 'acl' really gets cleared.
> 
> Reported-by: Mark Salyzyn <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
> Cc: Eric Van Hensbergen <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ron Minnich <[email protected]>
> Cc: Latchesar Ionkov <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <[email protected]>

>  fs/9p/acl.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/9p/acl.c b/fs/9p/acl.c
> index b3c2cc7..082d227 100644
> --- a/fs/9p/acl.c
> +++ b/fs/9p/acl.c
> @@ -277,6 +277,7 @@ static int v9fs_xattr_set_acl(const struct xattr_handler 
> *handler,
>       case ACL_TYPE_ACCESS:
>               if (acl) {
>                       struct iattr iattr;
> +                     struct posix_acl *old_acl = acl;
>  
>                       retval = posix_acl_update_mode(inode, &iattr.ia_mode, 
> &acl);
>                       if (retval)
> @@ -287,6 +288,7 @@ static int v9fs_xattr_set_acl(const struct xattr_handler 
> *handler,
>                                * by the mode bits. So don't
>                                * update ACL.
>                                */
> +                             posix_acl_release(old_acl);
>                               value = NULL;
>                               size = 0;
>                       }

Reply via email to