4.8-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Sinan Kaya <[email protected]>

commit 98756f5319c64c883caa910dce702d9edefe7810 upstream.

Commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
replaced the addition of PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING in acpi_pci_link_allocate()
with an addition in acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(), but f7eca374f000
("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation") removed the use
of acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty() for ISA IRQs.

Therefore, PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING is missing from ISA IRQs used by
interrupt links.  Include that penalty by adding it in the
acpi_pci_link_allocate() path.

Fixes: f7eca374f000 (ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation)
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Jonathan Liu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 drivers/acpi/pci_link.c |    4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
@@ -608,6 +608,10 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_allocate(struct
                            acpi_device_bid(link->device));
                return -ENODEV;
        } else {
+               if (link->irq.active < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
+                       acpi_isa_irq_penalty[link->irq.active] +=
+                               PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
+
                printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "%s [%s] enabled at IRQ %d\n",
                       acpi_device_name(link->device),
                       acpi_device_bid(link->device), link->irq.active);


Reply via email to