Em Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 06:57:56AM -0700, Andi Kleen escreveu: > > What we do know about the CPU vendor event names is that they are vendor > > specific, > > and that's a pretty stable property. So my suggestion would be to simply > > make it: > > > > perf list vendor > > > > with perhaps add aliases as well: > > > > perf list model > > perf list cpu-model > > > > ... and 'perf list hardware' should probably also list all the vendor > > specific > > hardware events as well. > > Sure can change it. > > > > > Could we please work a bit more on making vendor specific hardware event > > handling > > more usable to people who don't care about internals? > > Do you prefer fully new patches, or are incremential patches ok?
I would like for you to base of my perf/urgent branch as of now, that has those two patches yanked out so that the others can go thru. Ingo, please consider pulling from the perf-urgent-for-mingo-20161017 tag, just signed and pushed, it has: tag perf-urgent-for-mingo-20161017 Tagger: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Date: Mon Oct 17 11:26:10 2016 -0300 perf/urgent fixes: - Fix handling of numa nodes in perf.data files (Jiri Olsa) - Fix scrolling when refreshing 'perf top --tui --hierarchy' entries (Namhyung Kim) - Fix building of JIT support on Ubuntu 16.04 (Anton Blanchard) - Fix handling of events including .c and .o, that were being treated as BPF scripts instead of vendor ones (Wang Nan) Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> - Arnaldo
