On 09/23, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > The "num" is the number of clk_hw entries in the structure, so > "unsigned int" would be a better fit. (size_t looks like data > size we count by byte.) > > Besides, struct clk_onecell_data already uses unsigned int for > "clk_num". > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]> > ---
Seems fair. Applied to clk-next -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
