On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Dave Hansen <[email protected]> wrote: > On 09/06/2016 01:31 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> [NODE (0)] >> ZONELIST_FALLBACK >> (0) (node 0) (zone DMA c00000000140c000) >> (1) (node 1) (zone DMA c000000100000000) >> (2) (node 2) (zone DMA c000000200000000) >> (3) (node 3) (zone DMA c000000300000000) >> ZONELIST_NOFALLBACK >> (0) (node 0) (zone DMA c00000000140c000) > > Don't we have some prohibition on dumping out kernel addresses like this > so that attackers can't trivially defeat kernel layout randomization?
Anything printing memory addresses should be using %pK (not %lx as done here). -Kees -- Kees Cook Nexus Security
