4.7-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> commit 33da54fa86e29b87fe1e83bd0f15b4ef2be53ecb upstream. Michael reported 'perf mem -t store record' being broken. The reason is latest rework of this area: commit acbe613e0c03 ("perf tools: Add monitored events array") We don't mark perf_mem_events store record when -t store option is specified. Committer notes: Before: # perf mem -t store record usleep 1 [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.020 MB perf.data (7 samples) ] # perf evlist cycles:ppp # After: # perf mem -t store record usleep 1 [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.020 MB perf.data (7 samples) ] # perf evlist cpu/mem-stores/P # Reported-by: Michael Petlan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Cc: David Ahern <[email protected]> Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Fixes: acbe613e0c03 ("perf tools: Add monitored events array") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- tools/perf/builtin-mem.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) --- a/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c @@ -87,6 +87,9 @@ static int __cmd_record(int argc, const if (mem->operation & MEM_OPERATION_LOAD) perf_mem_events[PERF_MEM_EVENTS__LOAD].record = true; + if (mem->operation & MEM_OPERATION_STORE) + perf_mem_events[PERF_MEM_EVENTS__STORE].record = true; + if (perf_mem_events[PERF_MEM_EVENTS__LOAD].record) rec_argv[i++] = "-W";
